SJM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Conagra Brands has a net margin of -34.01% compared to JM Smucker's net margin of 5.11%. JM Smucker's return on equity of -17.05% beat Conagra Brands's return on equity of 3.74%.

JM Smucker has a consensus price target of $111.09, signalling upside risk potential of 15.03%. On the other hand Conagra Brands has an analysts' consensus of $24.91 which suggests that it could grow by 15.9%. Given that Conagra Brands has higher upside potential than JM Smucker, analysts believe Conagra Brands is more attractive than JM Smucker.

JM Smucker has a beta of 0.346, which suggesting that the stock is 65.397% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.138, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.174%.

JM Smucker has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.46%. Conagra Brands offers a yield of 6.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. JM Smucker pays -37% of its earnings as a dividend. Conagra Brands pays out 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend.

JM Smucker quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Conagra Brands quarterly revenues of $2.8B. JM Smucker's net income of -$729M is lower than Conagra Brands's net income of $145.1M. Notably, JM Smucker's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.09x while Conagra Brands's PE ratio is 31.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JM Smucker is 1.18x versus 0.88x for Conagra Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Campbell's has a net margin of -34.01% compared to JM Smucker's net margin of 2.67%. JM Smucker's return on equity of -17.05% beat The Campbell's's return on equity of 11.74%.

JM Smucker has a consensus price target of $111.09, signalling upside risk potential of 15.03%. On the other hand The Campbell's has an analysts' consensus of $39.08 which suggests that it could grow by 22.73%. Given that The Campbell's has higher upside potential than JM Smucker, analysts believe The Campbell's is more attractive than JM Smucker.

JM Smucker has a beta of 0.346, which suggesting that the stock is 65.397% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Campbell's has a beta of 0.106, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.379%.

JM Smucker has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.46%. The Campbell's offers a yield of 4.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. JM Smucker pays -37% of its earnings as a dividend. The Campbell's pays out 78.48% of its earnings as a dividend. The Campbell's's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

JM Smucker quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than The Campbell's quarterly revenues of $2.5B. JM Smucker's net income of -$729M is lower than The Campbell's's net income of $66M. Notably, JM Smucker's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.09x while The Campbell's's PE ratio is 21.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JM Smucker is 1.18x versus 0.94x for The Campbell's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mondelez International has a net margin of -34.01% compared to JM Smucker's net margin of 4.32%. JM Smucker's return on equity of -17.05% beat Mondelez International's return on equity of 13.15%.

JM Smucker has a consensus price target of $111.09, signalling upside risk potential of 15.03%. On the other hand Mondelez International has an analysts' consensus of $72.93 which suggests that it could grow by 6.76%. Given that JM Smucker has higher upside potential than Mondelez International, analysts believe JM Smucker is more attractive than Mondelez International.

JM Smucker has a beta of 0.346, which suggesting that the stock is 65.397% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mondelez International has a beta of 0.483, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.72%.

JM Smucker has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.46%. Mondelez International offers a yield of 2.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. JM Smucker pays -37% of its earnings as a dividend. Mondelez International pays out 50.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Mondelez International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

JM Smucker quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Mondelez International quarterly revenues of $9.3B. JM Smucker's net income of -$729M is lower than Mondelez International's net income of $402M. Notably, JM Smucker's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.09x while Mondelez International's PE ratio is 25.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JM Smucker is 1.18x versus 2.50x for Mondelez International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Natural Foods has a net margin of -34.01% compared to JM Smucker's net margin of -0.09%. JM Smucker's return on equity of -17.05% beat United Natural Foods's return on equity of -4.15%.

JM Smucker has a consensus price target of $111.09, signalling upside risk potential of 15.03%. On the other hand United Natural Foods has an analysts' consensus of $25.29 which suggests that it could grow by 18.21%. Given that United Natural Foods has higher upside potential than JM Smucker, analysts believe United Natural Foods is more attractive than JM Smucker.

JM Smucker has a beta of 0.346, which suggesting that the stock is 65.397% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.900, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.965%.

JM Smucker has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.46%. United Natural Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. JM Smucker pays -37% of its earnings as a dividend. United Natural Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

JM Smucker quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than United Natural Foods quarterly revenues of $8.1B. JM Smucker's net income of -$729M is lower than United Natural Foods's net income of -$7M. Notably, JM Smucker's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.09x while United Natural Foods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JM Smucker is 1.18x versus 0.04x for United Natural Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.